DISCUSS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARCHAEOLOGY AND GEOLOGY.(Ay 304)
For several centuries
the study of geology has been fundamental in answering various questions in
archaeology. As such archaeologists have not only been contingent to the
discipline of geology but have proved it to be useful in their various
archaeological researches. Its extreme was reached in 1976 when the term
Archaeogeology was, for the first time, used by Colin Renfrew to describe the
contribution of the geological sciences to geology. (Norman and Evan 1998:20).
To monument the importance of geology in archaeological tasks, the
geological society of America (GSA) established the Archaeological Geology
Division in 1977, whose purpose was to provide suitable forum for
presentation of papers on archaeological geology and to stimulate research and
teaching in archaeological geology. The earlier documentation of the influence
of geology in archaeology is believed to have started in 1830 when Charles
Lyell published his Principles of Geology. In 1863, he published his famous
book Te Geological Evidence of the antiquity of Man, in which he used
geological context to document the remains and artifacts of early humans.
It is from such pretext
that this paper attempts to analyze the relationship between archaeology and
geology, a study that, among other things, aims to illustrate the extent to
which the discipline of archaeology has benefited from the study of geology at
large. For the purpose of this discussion, two major terms are also going to be
examined; Archaeology and Geology.
According to Fagan
(2009:4), Archaeology is the scientific study of the human past, of ancient
human behavior, from the earliest time right up to the present. As such,
archaeology is part of wider discipline of archaeology which studies all
aspects of humanity, ancient and modern. But archaeologists are unique among
scientists in that they study changes in human culture over long period of time.
On the other hand Collin
and Paul define archaeology as partly discovery of treasures of the past,
partly the meticulous work of scientific analyst, partly the exercise of the
creative imagination. Archaeology then is both physical activity out in the
field and an intellectual pursuit in+ the study of laboratories. (Renfrew and
Bahn 2008:12)
By and large, the study
of archaeology is concerned with analysis of human culture by using cultural
remains and other cultural phenomena.
Geology can be defined
as the study of solid Earth, the rocks of which it is composed, and the process
by which they change. Geology can also refer to the study of the solid features
of any celestial body. It gives insight into the history of Earth by providing
the primary evidence for plate tectonics, the evolutionary history of life, and
past climates. Geology has been divided into two major groups namely; planetary
geology and applied geology. (Lidell, et al. 1996)
Planetary geology has to
do with exploration of other planets i.e with the advent of space exploration
in the twentieth century, geologists have begun to look at other planetary
bodies in the same ways that have been developed to study the Earth. This new
field of study is called planetary geology (sometimes known as astrogeology)
and relies on known geologic principles to study other bodies of the solar
system.
Applied geology is the
geology that is used in various areas of practice including mining,
engineering, hydrology and environmental issues and, in due course, archaeology.
According to Norman and
Evan (1998:20), in their book, Geological Methods for Archaeology, geology
covers substantial roles in various archaeological processes as follows;
Geology facilitates
archaeological sites exploration. The first decision that must be made in any
new archaeological program is where to dig. In many cases, the decision can be
based on historical records, by the visible remains of ancient construction, or
by the discovery of abundant artifacts. However, to see deep enough into the surface
so that decision can be made on specific target areas for excavation, and also
to obtain an idea of what artifacts and constructions to expect, techniques
involving geology are increasingly used.
Analysis and
interpretation of archaeological site and its environment. In archaeological
studies, landscapes and environment can be recreated through studies of
geomorphology and sedimentology embedded in geology. As such, geology is used
to analyses the deposits found in the surface that provides much of the
evidence for changes in land forms over time. These deposits may be residual
materials , formed in place by weathering of underlying formations, or may have
been formed elsewhere and then transported by wind, water, or humans to their
present site of deposition. The kind and amount of surficial materials change
with changing land surface and climatic conditions and so offer the est
evidence regarding the evolution of the landscape. An understanding of these
changes on a site will allow re-creation of the palaeoenvironment at the time
of occupation and modeling of the prehistoric land-use patterns. Archaeological
exploration in an area is facilitated by first pinpointing desirable habitation
sites of the time and then targeting these sites for geophysical and geological
prospecting.
Excavation process,
geology and geomorphic-sedimentologic information can help develop excavation
strategies. Such information commonly allows a better idea of the distribution
and nature of buried artifacts and may explain anomalous surficial
redistribution of artifacts, for example, by downslope wash or sediment burial.
In doing that three major phases are involved; Geomorphic mapping that provides
descriptions of the landforms, drainage pattern, surficial deposits, tectonic features
and any active geomophological process; analysis of the erosion process that
carved the land forms-including soil formation, sediment removal or deposition
and tectonic uplift-are documented; the land-forms, climate, and surficial
deposits of today are extrapolated back to reconstruct palaeoenvironmrnt and
palaeoclimate at the time of the occupation of the site.
Geology helps in
archaeological artifact analysis since it can be used to determine the sources
of raw materials used in the artifact. For example, the development and spread
of iron technology were clearly evident in the production of pots at different
sites in the Tigris-Euphrates Valley beginning about 5500BC. The designs were
universally used and emanated from single sites, so that archaeologically it
appeared that the pots were being exported from those sites. However, since the
materials used at each site were determined to be local, technology was
exported not the pottery. Each site must have had its own production center,
which took advantage of the raw materilas: it also must have had a
representative of the “head office” to ensure quality and artistic control.
(Norman and Evan 1998:20).
Both archaeology and
geology use various dating techniques in obtaining both absolute and relative
dates of various materials. The methods used in dating can be explained through
various laws or principles that include;
The principle of
Uniformitarianism , this was a fundamental principle of geology advanced by the
18th century Scottish physician and geologist James Hutton. The principle
states that the geologic processes observed in operation that modify the
Earth's crust at present have worked in much the same way over geologic time.
In Hutton's words: the present is the key to the past and the past history of
our globe must be explained by what can be seen to be happening now.
The principle of
intrusive relationships. This principle concerns crosscutting intrusions. In
geology, when an igneous intrusion cuts across a formation of sedimentary rock,
it can be determined that the igneous intrusion is younger than the sedimentary
rock. There are a number of different types of intrusions, including stocks,
laccoliths, batholiths, sills and dikes. Such principle can be applied in
archaeology to determine the age of sediments.
The principle of
cross-cutting relationships. This dating principle pertains to the formation of
faults and the age of the sequences through which they cut. Faults are younger
than the rocks they cut; accordingly, if a fault is found that penetrates some
formations but not those on top of it, then the formations that were cut are
older than the fault, and the ones that are not cut must be younger than the
fault. Finding the key bed in these situations may help determine whether the
fault is a normal fault or a thrust fault. In archaeology, this principle
enables dating of artifacts found in such fault rocks.
The law of
superposition. This law states that a sedimentary rock layer in a tectonically
undisturbed sequence is younger than the one beneath it and older than the one
above it. Logically a younger layer cannot slip beneath a layer previously
deposited. This principle allows sedimentary layers to be viewed as a form of
vertical time line, a partial or complete record of the time elapsed from
deposition of the lowest layer to deposition of the highest bed.
Stratigraphy can also be
used to determine relative age of various remains. This is done
through analysis of stratigraphic position, style and absorption of
transient elements. Objects found in the same undisturbed stratigraphic horizon
are perceived to have the same age, those in a lighter horizon are perceived to
be younger, and those are perceived to be older.
Both Archaeology and
geology can be used to understand past events. For example, through the study
of Geology, Geologists may come up with the list of prominent events thst must
have influenced sediments and or rocks causing them to change from one shape to
another. On other hand, Archaeology also is used to understand past events,
this is done through analysis of artifacts, ecofacts, structures and features.
However, the two
studies; Archaeology and geology differ in various ways as illustrated below;
Geology deals with
analysis of both Earth and other planets in its branch of planetary geology.
However, Archaeology, up to this moment focus on analysis of materials found on
Earth and this is particularly because Archaeology is concerned with knowing
past human culture who are perceived to be found on Earth alone.
Geology primarily
studies the Earth, solid materials and rocks. They work to understand the
history of the Earth. Archaeology, on the other hand studies humankind by using
artifacts and remains that can be found in the ground by ancient humans.
(Lidell, et al. 1996)
Archaeology deals with
analysis of both organic and inorganic materials, that is to say it deals with
both modified and unmodified remains which include the remains of animals and
plants. On the other hand Geology deals with inorganic materials that include
rocks and in no way includes animals and plants.
Finally, it can be said
that Archaeology and Geology are closely related disciplines. As such, not only
is it impossible to conduct archaeological process without Geology, but the
whole process of conducting archaeological excavation requires knowledge of
Geology. It is from such understanding that Colin Renfrew in 1976 established
the term Archaeogeology to combine the two disciplines as they were seem to be
inseparable from one another.
REFERENCES
Fegan M (2009) Archaeology:
A brief introduction. California. Prentice Hall press.
Levin, L (2010) The
earth through time (9th ed.). Hoboken, Oxford University press.
Lidell, G (1996). A
Greek-English lexicon. Oxford, Oxford University press.
Norman H, and Evan G
(1998). Geological Methods for Archaeology, Oxford, Oxford
University press.
Olsen, E (2001). "Steno's Principles of Stratigraphy".
Dinosaurs and the History of Life. Columbia. Columbia University
press.
Renflew, C and Bahn, P
(2008) Archaeology: Theories, Methods and practice. Oxford.
Thames and Hudson publishers.
.
Reijer, H (1963) Natural Law and Divine Miracle: The Principle of Uniformity
in Geology, Biology, and Theology, Leid-en. EJ Brill press.
Comments
Post a Comment