Relationship between history and Archaeology.
History is defined as
the study of past human events. This definition is however very limited for it
is not all past human events that constitute history, human activities are
multiple and take place every day that they cannot be all be taken as
historical event .History Therefore is the study of the selected past
human events. The selection of study of historical events depends on the
historians himself, his own background, the political and socio economic
environment in which he lives, the message he wants to communicate to his
consumers and the lesson he wants them to learn Tarimo (2004).
Therefore we can define
history as an interaction between the historian and his fact and an interaction
between the past, present, and the future.
For a long time until 20thcentury
written sources had been regarded as the only sources of history, absence of
such sources in sub-Saharan Africa leads to the conclusion by the colonial
historian that black Africans had no history Tarimo (2004).
The necessity to
decolonize Africans history from its colonial biases, following attainment of
independence by African states leads to the rigorous search for others. The
application of these new sources made it possible to rewrite the African
history more scientifically and from an African point of view whereby shading
it from the colonial biases from 1960s, onwards Tarimo (2004).
Archeology is a source
of history concerned with the study of past human physical and cultural remains
(fossil and artifacts) recovered from the earth by archeological exaction. As
such archeology deals with pre-historical as well as historical periods of the
human society.
Archeological as the
study of the human cultural and social past whose goals are to narrate the
sequent story of the past and to explain the events that composed it
Willey and Sabliff (1980).
Archeology is interested
in both the objects made by the people of the past cultures and civilizations
and why the people lived the way they did. To achieve these goals,
archeologists excavate and analyze the remains and monuments of the past
cultures and the context in which they found, whether they concentrate on the
most ancient human societies or those of more recent centuries, all archeologists
agree that the fundamental responsibility is to conserve the past for future
generation Renfrew and Bahn ( 2012).
Pre history is the
history of mankind before the appearance of written document pre historic
archeology is the study analysis and interpretation of the material culture of
pre historic society in order to describe and explain the history and culture
of these societies.
It can therefore be
argued that archeology is closely related with history in the following
factors;
Both disciplines seek
knowledge of human past, history deals primarily with written account from the
past and archeology deals primarily with the physical remains of the past
Robert (2003).
Archeology is also
linked with history in a more particular manner, the history of the earliest
literate societies such as those of Egypt, Mesopotamia, Greece and Rome heavily
depends on archaeology which was in the first place resistible for the recovery
of the written history documents through archaeological excavations
Robert (2003).
Both archaeology and
history are complement each other, together providing a more complete record of
the past, for example some of archaeological invisible activities may described
in historical documents, also sometimes history can be used to locate the archaeological
sites, this means that through history we can find the archaeological sites
Robert (2003).
Both are related in
terms of methodology where archaeology and history use the same method in the
finding the past events, such as the use of observation where history and
archaeology use to observe a certain place where particular events took place,
nothing to do with history or archaeology without observation Willey and
Sabliff (1980).
Even in the most recent,
archaeology has contributed to the study of written history through the study
of artifacts and structures of such literate societies, hence the development
of new sub discipline of historical archaeology Fagan (1985).
Also historical
documents of course are physical remain of the past and can be studied as such,
clay tablets marked cuneiform writing ,Egyptian choreographic text on papyrus
and inscription carried on stone movement are just as much document as are the
book published in 17thcentury Europe obvious, therefore many
historical text are discovered through archeological research Robert
(2003).
History reconstructed by
archaeologist tends to be more anonymous for archaeological chronologies
rarely; therefore archaeology helps in reconstructing a history of particular
events in chronological order accorder according to happening of the events
Willey and Sabliff (1980).
Apart from similarities,
also history and archaeology differ in the following aspects;
History deals primarily
with written accounts from the past while archaeology deals with material
remains of the past, these material remains are mute, they meaning and
significance depends entirely on the interference that trained archaeologist
can make in contrast, historical record contain message that trained
archaeologist can make in contrast, historical record contain message that
although their meaning and significance are also subject to critical
interpretation to discover and get rid of exaggeration lies or other biases in
written sources Renfrew and Bahn (2012).
Historical focus on literate
and richest communities such as kings, queens, and high priests, the prominence
of these people could have influence the storage of their records while
archaeology is less partial for rich or learned folk, every one contributes to
the archaeological record Robert (2003).
Another contrast is
found on the scope or coverage of two disciplines; archaeology covers the
period from the beginning of human culture (2.5 million years ago) to present,
for this case archaeology is our primary source of information for 99% of human
history while history covers the period from the beginning of written records
(3000BC) to present Fagan (1985).
History includes the
stories of what happened, where, how and who did it and what happened next,
archaeology is concerned with the place where the story took place only such as
temple, artwork such as painting Willey and Sabliff( 1980).
Historian are concerned
about text while archaeologist keep themselves busy with artifacts, history is
based on written documents, compare to archaeology which deals artifacts like
fossils(human remains),food remains, ruin of buildings and human artifacts
items such as tool, pottery and jewelry Robert (2003).
Conclusively,
archaeology and history have formed close alliances, drawing on the methods of
both disciplines in the study of particular era of human past. For instance
.the long established field of classical archaeology combines the methods of
archaeology with the use of historical source to document ,the classical
civilizations of Greece and Roma .Classical archaeology is also traditionally
allied to the field of art history, which provides another route to
understand the past .In the recent years scholars in history ,art history
and archaeology ,brought together by a common interest on a given
subject and time period have increasingly combined their expertise to the add
new insight to studies such as medieval Europe , the industrial
revolution and European colonization of new world.
REFERENCES
Fagan,
B.M (1985). In the Beginning: An Introduction
to Archaeology. Torongo: Little Brown and Company.
Robert,
J.S (2003). Archaeology discovering our past.
Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania University Press.
Renfrew,
G and Bahn, P. (2012).Archaeology:
Theory, Method and Practice. London: Thames and Hudson Ltd.
Tarimo,
E.C.J (2004). An Introduction to African
History to 1880. Dares Salaam: Open
University of Tanzania. (OUT).
Willey,
R.and Sabloff, A. (1980). A History of
American Archaeology. San Francisco: Freeman and Company.
thank you for the deep scope knowledge
ReplyDeleteoky your welcome
Deletethanks a lot for your research.
DeleteEnter your comment...Good works. Thanks a lot.
ReplyDeleteGood try
ReplyDeleteThe best stunt to play the game is challenge better players and don't consider yourself to be the victor.
ReplyDeletepixelgun3dgame.com/pixel-gun-3d-pc/
Helpful
ReplyDeleteSo helpful thanks
ReplyDeleteagreed dont count your oponit out
ReplyDeleteThanks for the information 🙏
ReplyDelete